Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 14:41:25 -0700 From: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> To: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r264935 - head/release/amd64 Message-ID: <535AD685.90606@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201404252111.s3PLB00Q043705@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201404252111.s3PLB00Q043705@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 04/25/14 14:11, Glen Barber wrote: > Author: gjb > Date: Fri Apr 25 21:11:00 2014 > New Revision: 264935 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/264935 > > Log: > Add a separate script to build the memstick.img and the > mini-memstick.img with UEFI support. > > As the comments in the file suggest, 1) there must > be existing ${.OBJDIR}/usr/src/release/{release,bootonly}; > 2) TARGET/TARGET_ARCH must be amd64; and 3) it must be > a vt(4)-enabled kernel with vt_efifb (*not* vt_vga). > > This script is not hooked into release/Makefile in any way > until further testing is complete. > > Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation > > Added: > head/release/amd64/make-uefi-memstick.sh (contents, props changed) > > I understand this is for testing, but is there any reason we can't just have one GPT memstick that boots both BIOS and EFI eventually? Or is that the plan already? -Nathan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?535AD685.90606>