Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 12:44:37 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@chuckr.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Building kernel without some modules Message-ID: <20050504194437.GB92026@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <4279128B.9080106@chuckr.org> References: <20050504040349.GA1460@gad.glazov.net> <20050504041730.GA45260@xor.obsecurity.org> <4279128B.9080106@chuckr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 06:20:59PM +0000, Chuck Robey wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 09:03:49AM +0500, Vitaly Bogdanov wrote: > > > >>Hi. > >>Is it possible to build kernel without compiling unnecessary modules? > >>My system - freebsd5.3. > > > > > >See make.conf(5) >=20 > That wasn't very nice. It's not that it's wrong, but the fella sounded= =20 > to me like he was asking if a target existed, and not everyone is=20 > familiar with our make. Responding like you did had the sole function=20 > of trying to shut off any other responses, and was just not helpful at=20 > all to the querent. That's kind of silly. The answer to his question is documented right there in that manpage, so why should I type it out for him? Kris --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCeSYlWry0BWjoQKURAtPLAKD2cUTm4aZg20dGC+9Sw4oXWB1EPgCdGp7m IWIkGdEvYaneSueHEUkrnRo= =wWrg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050504194437.GB92026>