Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 08:16:03 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Herdman <andrew@whine.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Ron Bolin <rlb@mindspring.com>, FreeBSD Current Mailing List <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: i386 and Alpha Src Tree Question Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980313081551.17204B-100000@why> In-Reply-To: <18394.889773844@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >> Since I have only Intel class machines like many others. Does it >> make sense to organize the tree where cvsups and the general make file >> sequence does not download or depend on the Alpha code being in the >> tree? > >Probably not, no. It's not something that's entirely confined to a >single hierarchy (support is and must be intertwined at many different >levels of the source tree). > >> It seems like we are going to have lots of space taken up by the Alpha >> code. > >Bite the bullet. The OpenBSD and NetBSD folks have been bearing this >cost for ages, and you should count yourself lucky that you don't also >have to deal with m68k or PPC or VAX code, for example, in your >tree. :-) Yet. Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980313081551.17204B-100000>