Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 18:04:31 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: threads@freebsd.org, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Symbol versioning errors in libthr Message-ID: <86r6fsd55s.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802041146260.13899@sea.ntplx.net> (Daniel Eischen's message of "Mon\, 4 Feb 2008 11\:55\:52 -0500 \(EST\)") References: <861w7um5o5.fsf@ds4.des.no> <e7db6d980802030759x6db9bf1dq8992542bd8d2e017@mail.gmail.com> <20080203162918.GK57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20080203121112.426a8c25@kan.dnsalias.net> <86zlugeqaz.fsf@ds4.des.no> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0802041146260.13899@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> writes: > I question the bumping of FBSDprivate to 1.1. FBSDprivate is special, > it is only for use in our base system, and our supported method of > updating our system is buildworkd/buildkernel - so any changes to > FBSDprivate should be unnoticed. A whole lot of assumptions there. Bumping FBSDprivate costs nothing and might save our a***s down the road if one of those assumptions turn out to be false. (unless you can show that it's actually harmful in some way?) DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86r6fsd55s.fsf>