Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:11:15 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] More meaningful information about ENOEXEC for kldload(8) Message-ID: <ia69g1$m3p$1@dough.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinoQR1KGbwL3m-Gbc5zi2drbJ_XhsxaqnKfuhKz@mail.gmail.com> References: <4CC5D83E.8030505@delphij.net> <4CC5D9DB.1020409@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTindYRwpmA=En%2BpYyHVcUkmQ0wsZrB7Y-f2E=vK=@mail.gmail.com> <ia4pjg$650$1@dough.gmane.org> <4CC5F35A.7090809@FreeBSD.org> <AANLkTinoQR1KGbwL3m-Gbc5zi2drbJ_XhsxaqnKfuhKz@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/26/10 02:53, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Wouldn't noting this in the manpage be sufficient? > I ran into this `item' (:)..) today after a power outage because > nvidia-driver was built against different kernel headers, and it > prints out the error clear as day on /dev/console, Luckily in your case, it happened *before* starting X :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ia69g1$m3p$1>