Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:34:55 -0700 From: Enji Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> To: Susan Stanziano <susan.stanziano@xinuos.com> Cc: freebsd-testing@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kyua reporting tool question Message-ID: <80FAC842-ECCB-438F-BBC4-0995A7C1D7B1@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <555587672.2279585.1554935416410.JavaMail.zimbra@xinuos.com> References: <555587672.2279585.1554935416410.JavaMail.zimbra@xinuos.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Apr 10, 2019, at 3:30 PM, Susan Stanziano <susan.stanziano@xinuos.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > A question on the kyua reporting tool: > > kyua report --results-filter > > should not include passed tests if used without an argument. > > But, when I run it this way I get all results including passed. > > And if I run it with an argument (failed), I still get all results: > > kyua report --results-filter failed > > --results-filter types Comma-separated list of the test result types to include in the > report. The ordering of the values is respected so that you can > determine how you want the list of tests to be shown. > > The valid values are: ‘broken’, ‘failed’, ‘passed’, ‘skipped’ and > ‘xfail’. If the parameter supplied to the option is empty, filtering > is suppressed and all result types are shown in the report. > > The default value for this flag includes all the test results except > the passed tests. Showing the passed tests by default clutters the > report with too much information, so only abnormal conditions are > > Any insight is appreciated. Hi Susan! What happens if you use `kyua report —results-filter=failed` (note the `=`)? -Enji
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?80FAC842-ECCB-438F-BBC4-0995A7C1D7B1>