Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 16:45:50 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: procfs patch Message-ID: <199708112245.QAA03222@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970812014216.8334B-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> References: <199708111911.MAA23776@kithrup.com> <Pine.BSF.3.96.970812014216.8334B-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= writes: > On Mon, 11 Aug 1997, Sean Eric Fagan wrote: > > > Consider this: > > > > you run suid program > > it does some stuff, then sesetuid's to you > > it then exec's a program, as you > > > > You can make that last program core dump. Got it? It can core dump. It > > can core dump. It can core dump. > > At this point you just not make clear enough in your previous postings > that _exec_ happens between setuid and core dump, it cause Marc's and my > confusion. RTFS. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199708112245.QAA03222>