Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 01:13:56 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> To: mokhi <mokhi64@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-numerics@freebsd.org Subject: Re: C11 conformance of casinl-like functions. Message-ID: <20170209010941.J16975@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <CAByVWPXomH1ijy4oUHjw991c_hgyHQU6Zti1j1jYutxuHE4jcw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAByVWPUvbG78nUoxQQAOTTY9dJa1agjCZo9oO3dShv2U8Q=y0A@mail.gmail.com> <20170208221449.K14261@besplex.bde.org> <CAByVWPXomH1ijy4oUHjw991c_hgyHQU6Zti1j1jYutxuHE4jcw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017, mokhi wrote: >> I think you mean acosl, asinl, ... > yeah :D > >> These were implemented quite well in 2012-2013, but not quite finished, >> and not committed. Only the float and double version were committed. >> The raw versions are still available in >> https://people.freebsd.org/~stephen/catrig*.c. These have rotted and >> require some editing. Compare with the committed parts to see most >> of the necessary editing. > Okay, I'll do. > Would you like that I add you on Phabricator for reviewing when my > editing is done? Only put it on Phabricator if you want me to not see it. This list was supposed to be for specialized review[er]s but doesn't have enough writers to be very useful. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170209010941.J16975>