Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 01:20:00 GMT From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/184648: Regression: some comments in calendar OK in 9.1, fail in 10.0-BETA4 Message-ID: <201312100120.rBA1K0lC073085@freefall.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
The following reply was made to PR bin/184648; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/184648: Regression: some comments in calendar OK in 9.1, fail in 10.0-BETA4 Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 19:12:14 -0600 > I assume it's yet another problem from changing the compiler & thus > cpp. Technically, it's due to no longer using cpp at all, but implementing pieces of it internally in <http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=255715> X-ref a mail I sent to -current about hiccups it left, including a comment-related one: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2013-October/045829.html>help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201312100120.rBA1K0lC073085>
