Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:25:05 -0500
From:      Lucas Holt <luke@foolishgames.com>
To:        Jerry McAllister <jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu>
Cc:        "Kevin R. Lee" <kevin_lee@att.net>
Subject:   Re: Info.
Message-ID:  <D45C2326-46A5-11D8-9187-000A95EFF4CA@foolishgames.com>
In-Reply-To: <200401141513.i0EFDx714503@clunix.cl.msu.edu>
References:  <200401141513.i0EFDx714503@clunix.cl.msu.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 From my understanding a DEC Alpha system contained an Alpha processor.  
I don't know a lot about them, but I believe they are RISC based and 
had a portion of the chip that was programmable for the operating 
system to add custom instructions to.  There was a windows NT 4 port to 
the alpha and DEC and later compaq/hp had a Unix for them as well.

Some alpha systems are still in production use.  I know a college 
around here that uses it for a custom security system with keycards.  
The software they use was never ported to the x86 version (IA32 for 
people who hate that term) of NT4.

Lucas Holt
Luke@FoolishGames.com
________________________________________________________
FoolishGames.com  (Jewel Fan Site)
JustJournal.com (Free blogging)

'Re-implementing what I designed in 1979 is not interesting to me 
personally. For kids who are 20 years younger than me, Linux is a great 
way to cut your teeth. It's a cultural phenomenon and a business 
phenomenon. Mac OS X is a rock-solid system that's beautifully 
designed. I much prefer it to Linux.'
-- Bill Joy, Wired Article 2003



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D45C2326-46A5-11D8-9187-000A95EFF4CA>