Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 23:48:23 +0100 From: Marc Recht <marc@informatik.uni-bremen.de> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>, Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: __BSD_VISIBLE and u_int Message-ID: <238240000.1039819703@leeloo.intern.geht.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0212131423560.37378-100000@root.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0212131423560.37378-100000@root.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] > Hmm, which of these defines claims posix src? -D_ANSI_SOURCE ? > > cc -O -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -mcpu=pentiumpro -I./../include [...] > >> u_int is undocumented and unportable, so it probably shouldn't be >> used. It's only 3 characters shorter than `unsigned' anyway. > > It's for ports. And this is once a again a good example why we _really_ need a define (like Solaris'__EXTENSIONS__ ) that sets __BSD_VISIBLE (no matter what) and could be set in CONFIBURE_ENV. Regards, Marc "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." -- Donald E. Knuth [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9+mO37YQCetAaG3MRAkXzAJ4wz2rsNNHCE/lRfyTU1A2gLmGRygCghTgF V4031+f+Tew1Ik0EimRYQ3k= =Gj1J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?238240000.1039819703>