Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 18:28:23 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: invalid opcode <coredump@nervosa.com> Cc: Frank Durda IV <uhclem@nemesis.lonestar.org>, freebsd-current@Freebsd.ORG Subject: Re: New kernel Message-ID: <22539.826511303@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 10 Mar 1996 17:18:35 PST." <Pine.BSF.3.91.960310171755.1843D-100000@nervosa.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sun, 10 Mar 1996, invalid opcode wrote: > > > How about PASSIVE instead of AGRESSIVE. > > == Chris Layne ============================================================ = > > How about ASSERTIVE? > > kernel: Would it be okay if I panic'ed now? (y/n) How about PASSIVE_AGGRESSIVE? The kernel doesn't actually panic, but corrupts your files occasionally when you're away on vacation. :-) Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22539.826511303>