Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 13:02:55 +0200 From: Benjamin Lutz <benlutz@datacomm.ch> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New category - ports/packages specific tools? Message-ID: <200605191302.58865.benlutz@datacomm.ch> In-Reply-To: <20060515222815.GA2535@picobyte.net> References: <20060515222815.GA2535@picobyte.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1215028.47pcdkniIB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I like the idea as well. While the current categories assigned the the=20 ports-related ports makes sense (doesn't sysutils, which is used for most,= =20 make perfect sense?), better discoverability for these programs is a good=20 thing. I like portutils as a new name, because it's easier to read and write than= =20 ports-mgmt. I'd also like the new category to be virtual only. If you look, at for=20 example, security/portaudit, it makes more sense to me to find that in the= =20 security than a portutils dir. And as I said, I find the sysutils dir=20 appropriate for ports things (although, looking at it, it could probably be= =20 cleaned up a bit - is eg. k3b really a sysutil? The tools it uses for the=20 actual burning, maybe, but k3b itself?) Cheers Benjamin --nextPart1215028.47pcdkniIB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEbaXigShs4qbRdeQRAlGOAJsH0jR/b4DXpkoRYHe6W6J1LqmhgACgh7Ri T+hzwroprYq4xIqztLIw8ww= =tQal -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1215028.47pcdkniIB--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200605191302.58865.benlutz>