Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:49:20 GMT From: Garrett Cooper <gcooper@FreeBSD.org> To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@FreeBSD.org> Subject: PERFORCE change 130696 for review Message-ID: <200712121149.lBCBnKEu006725@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=130696 Change 130696 by gcooper@shiina-ibook on 2007/12/12 11:48:28 Use size_t instead of unsigned int (for platform portability?). I just find size_t more consistent with use of sizeof(..). Affected files ... .. //depot/projects/soc2007/revised_fbsd_pkgtools/pkg_revised/v2/contrib/libpkg/pkg_db_freebsd.c#6 edit Differences ... ==== //depot/projects/soc2007/revised_fbsd_pkgtools/pkg_revised/v2/contrib/libpkg/pkg_db_freebsd.c#6 (text+ko) ==== @@ -326,9 +326,9 @@ struct dirent *de; char *dir; struct pkg **packages; - unsigned int packages_size; + size_t packages_size; unsigned int packages_pos; - + assert(db != NULL); assert(db->db_base != NULL);
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200712121149.lBCBnKEu006725>