Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:47:46 -0500
From:      Bill Vermillion <bill@bilver.wjv.com>
To:        freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Logging users out
Message-ID:  <20001031074745.A8423@wjv.com>
In-Reply-To: <s9qsnpd18vz.fsf@vangogh.prism.uvsq.fr>; from Thierry.Besancon@prism.uvsq.fr on Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 01:40:32PM %2B0100
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010301452030.2043-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au> <00103111391900.01594@freefire.psi-domain.co.uk> <20001031072255.A8035@wjv.com> <s9qsnpd18vz.fsf@vangogh.prism.uvsq.fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 31, 2000 at 01:40:32PM +0100, Thierry Besancon thus spoke:
> Dixit Bill Vermillion <bill@wjv.com> (le Tue, 31 Oct 2000 07:22:55 -0500) :
> 
> » > % ps -aux | grep username
> » 
> » > username   1637  1.3  0.7  1340  868  p1  Ds   11.36AM  0:00.09  csh
> » 
> » > then I just do a:
> » 
> » > % kill -KILL 1637
> » 
> » > not the best or cleanest way of doing it, but its just a quick
> » > method ive stuck with over the years.
> » 
> » Definately not the cleanest/best.  What's wrong with -HUP.
> » 
> » -KILL [aka -9] give no chance for proper file closure and cleanup.
> 
> When you kill -HUP a csh, it just remains. Nothing happens. You have
                       ^^^
> to kill -9 it to get rid of it. Just try.

That explains that.  I've studiously avoided csh for the past 15
years.  Shows I've not worked around a Sun environment much,
doesn't it?  Ever thought of using a better shell :-) [Add LOTS of
smileys here - I'm not going to get into a shell wars argument -
what works best for you, works best for you.  I'm a ksh user].

-- 
Bill Vermillion -   bv @ wjv . com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001031074745.A8423>