Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 02 May 2002 18:34:04 -0700
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
To:        Bill Fumerola <billf@mu.org>
Cc:        Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, "Andrew R. Reiter" <arr@FreeBSD.ORG>, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: savcore dump names?
Message-ID:  <3CD1E90C.2CC55AED@mindspring.com>
References:  <20020503002436.98DA538FD@overcee.wemm.org> <3CD1E0E4.86406459@mindspring.com> <20020503012406.GL688@elvis.mu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 05:59:16PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Can I ask AGAIN that the people who have a problem with the MD5
> > changes PLEASE describe acceptable-to-them savecore(8) behaviour,
> > other than just saying "put it back"?  Saying "the way it was" is
> > not a design specification.
> 
> multiple people have already iterated their exact problems with the
> recent changed behavior. perhaps your mail filters are faulty (or maybe
> you can't write 10 paragraph emails all day and keep up with the mail
> volume).
> 
> for your convienence, i've attached some URLs.
> 
> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=72271+0+current/freebsd-arch

I didn't see this one.


> http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=76958+0+current/freebsd-arch

I *did* see this one.  The quoting made it look like this
was a wishlist, not a list of lost functionality.  8-(.

Yes, this looks bad.

> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=83960+0+archive/2002/cvs-all/20020421.cvs-all
> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=52063+0+archive/2002/cvs-all/20020421.cvs-all


Not a mailing list I generally follow; when I do pull down a digest,
I usually filter out discussions that happen on the list.

This seems taken care of by Steve Kargyl's patch in the second
message, unless you are actually suggesting that the -N and -z be
reimplemented?


Yeah, I agree that lost functionality is bad.

Why not revert the changes, unless there's a commitment to
bring the new code back up to snuff with the old code?

The dump file format argument is bogus; it can be reverted as well.

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CD1E90C.2CC55AED>