Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:38:07 -0500 From: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> To: Bruce Evans <brde@optusnet.com.au> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG, Martin Cracauer <cracauer@FreeBSD.ORG>, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: svn commit: r231449 - head/usr.bin/tee Message-ID: <20120211163807.GA25525@cons.org> In-Reply-To: <20120211194854.J2214@besplex.bde.org> References: <201202102216.q1AMGI0m098192@svn.freebsd.org> <20120211194854.J2214@besplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I (kinda) knew I shouldn't have tried to do this real quick before leaving for a trip. I reverted the change and I'll fix the concerns including the commit message when I'm back in a week. Now I also want to know what exactly is going on in bash there, the difference between the explicit named pipe and bash'es construct is unexplained. Bruce, do you have a rule of thumb concerning reacting to EAGAIN with select/poll or with a busy loop, or with one try instantly and then going with select? Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org> http://www.cons.org/cracauer/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120211163807.GA25525>