Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 10:09:04 -0400 From: "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.org> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> Cc: Thomas Gellekum <tg@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/gnumail Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/mail/gnumail/files patch-..:Headers:AddressBookController.h patch-..:Headers:EditWindowController.h patch-..:Headers:MailboxManagerController.h patch-..:Headers:NewAddressPanelController.h Message-ID: <200108091409.f79E94j69254@green.bikeshed.org> In-Reply-To: Message from Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> of "Thu, 09 Aug 2001 15:50:01 %2B0200." <32512.997365001@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> wrote: > > > On Thu, 09 Aug 2001 04:06:25 MST, Thomas Gellekum wrote: > > > Modified files: > > mail/gnumail Makefile distinfo pkg-plist > > Added files: > > mail/gnumail/files patch-..:Headers:AddressBookController.h > > What's going on with these patch names? Have you seen the way patch > names are normally constructed? Does it matter? File names of patches will never be completely consistent. I know tons of ports that aren't even consistently naming patches with themselves. Heck, I even prefer the patch-[a-z][a-z] convention still ;) -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! / green@FreeBSD.org `------------------------------' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108091409.f79E94j69254>