Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:59:36 +0200 From: martin hudec <corwin@aeternal.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again Message-ID: <20050727105936.GA97664@amber.aeternal.net> In-Reply-To: <cb5206420507261613191c659c@mail.gmail.com> References: <cb52064205072616005af207a8@mail.gmail.com> <491A44A6-1409-4D9E-AEFD-2B8665D52BA7@gmail.com> <cb5206420507261613191c659c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Hello, On Wed, Jul 27, 2005 at 03:13:50AM +0400 or thereabouts, Andrew P. wrote: > Erm, well 60+Mbytes is no wonder in a Gigabit environment (and it is > too much of a wonder in a FastEthernet one), but I'm interested in > getting 100Mbit hardware to work at full speed. If I take that your "NE2000 $10 NIC's" is what you call 100Mbit hardware, then.. would you mind if I ask: what do you expect more from such $10-harware other than just to flicker and to eat electric current? Use *real* 100Mbit hardware please :). BTW I have same performance with my sis900/rl8139 NIC's. cheers, Martin -- martin hudec * 421 907 303 393 * corwin@aeternal.net * http://www.aeternal.net "Nothing travels faster than the speed of light with the possible exception of bad news, which obeys its own special laws." Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFC52kYZYEZIv+rgggRAsQ/AJ9EIWQ1K8iLGyISvxG3pmz5pukYLACeP59n nXxASdzmQHFJM8AI3lwQk7k= =mKF0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050727105936.GA97664>