Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 08:45:17 -0600 From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Robert Simmons <rsimmons0@gmail.com>, "Koornstra, Reinoud" <koornstra@hp.com> Subject: Re: Firewall Options Message-ID: <op.wtg9xr0k34t2sn@tech304.office.supranet.net> In-Reply-To: <0EEF6678B3EEC94B9AE44705DF224D023697268C@G9W0725.americas.hpqcorp.net> References: <CA%2BQLa9DgZWoajW0dTkNjOGsDsS=ggXefJK9v%2BtraZq4F99uUnQ@mail.gmail.com> <op.wtfdrmfs34t2sn@tech304.office.supranet.net> <0EEF6678B3EEC94B9AE44705DF224D023697268C@G9W0725.americas.hpqcorp.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:34:58 -0600, Koornstra, Reinoud <koornstra@hp.com> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Why not consider NPF from NetBSD where SMP friendly firewalling is a > given. I've actually been toying with the idea of reinstalling my firewall with NetBSD so I can try NPF. I just hate debugging firewall rules that I'm unfamiliar with :) However, it does look like an amazing project. I'm also not sure if NetBSD is more or less difficult to use as an upstream than OpenBSD.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wtg9xr0k34t2sn>