Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 08:45:17 -0600 From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, Robert Simmons <rsimmons0@gmail.com>, "Koornstra, Reinoud" <koornstra@hp.com> Subject: Re: Firewall Options Message-ID: <op.wtg9xr0k34t2sn@tech304.office.supranet.net> In-Reply-To: <0EEF6678B3EEC94B9AE44705DF224D023697268C@G9W0725.americas.hpqcorp.net> References: <CA%2BQLa9DgZWoajW0dTkNjOGsDsS=ggXefJK9v%2BtraZq4F99uUnQ@mail.gmail.com> <op.wtfdrmfs34t2sn@tech304.office.supranet.net> <0EEF6678B3EEC94B9AE44705DF224D023697268C@G9W0725.americas.hpqcorp.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 16:34:58 -0600, Koornstra, Reinoud <koornstra@hp.com> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Why not consider NPF from NetBSD where SMP friendly firewalling is a > given. I've actually been toying with the idea of reinstalling my firewall with NetBSD so I can try NPF. I just hate debugging firewall rules that I'm unfamiliar with :) However, it does look like an amazing project. I'm also not sure if NetBSD is more or less difficult to use as an upstream than OpenBSD.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wtg9xr0k34t2sn>