Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 18:30:36 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: Michael Gmelin <grembo@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: SM bus ioctls incorrect in FreeBSD 11 Message-ID: <cd749499-10ff-e843-bce9-3ef72124eb14@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20161014171126.74e6e2fc@bsd64.grem.de> References: <06929AC5-D350-4236-A813-56C862B58174@perftech.com> <fe780e23-f014-1c84-b702-12727cd68ef0@FreeBSD.org> <20161014171126.74e6e2fc@bsd64.grem.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 14/10/2016 18:11, Michael Gmelin wrote: > For some history on these changes, please see also [1] and [2] (there > were a few discussions and the revision was bumped, I also tried to > get some attention, but not enough it seems). > > Given your recent changes to iicbus in HEAD, I think it would be best to > MFC those and go with Option 4 or, if that's to drastic, go with > Option 1. I am leaning towards this approach as well. > Thanks for cleaning after me. You asked for a discussion and reviews. I can not recall what I was doing at that time, but I completely ignored the development and for that I can only blame myself. > [1]https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2015-March/016972.html > [2]https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2015-May/017157.html I also agree that having a thin library on top of the ioctl would be a convenience. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cd749499-10ff-e843-bce9-3ef72124eb14>