Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 10:52:49 -0700 (PDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: getenv_foo and TUNABLE_FOO_FETCH change Message-ID: <XFMail.011023105249.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20011023174220.BA0EB380A@overcee.netplex.com.au>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 23-Oct-01 Peter Wemm wrote:
> John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> Also, one final note about using do { } while(0). If you actually read
>> style(9), you will see that you are supposed to use it for compound
>> statement
> s,
>> not just for any macro that happens to be more than one line long. If the
>> macro's body is a single statement, it doesn't need the do { } while (0)
>> bit.
>
> It was there so that the macro didn't have a "value". Since you're
> changing this so they all have a meaningful return (eg: TUNABLE_STR_FETCH()
> did not before) then removing this makes sense.
Fair enough. It was more a side commentary as I've seen random commits that
make this mistake on other macros.
--
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.011023105249.jhb>