Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 6 Jun 1998 21:28:10 +0200 
From:      Mikael Hugo <mikael.hugo@dataphone.net>
To:        "'Jawaid Bazyar'" <bazyar@hypermall.com>
Cc:        linuxisp@friendly.jeffnet.org, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, iap@vma.cc.nd.edu
Subject:   RE: US West and RADSL (fwd)
Message-ID:  <E1DFDD6A058ED111BA4100E0290BC51F046B27@niagara.int.sesol.dataphone.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Force the telcos to let ISPs in, and you'll get it. But it won't be
"most 
>ISPs". In fact, forcing this may well make it impossible for small ISPs

>to get access, whereas only the largest ISPs can afford the "drop a
DSLAM 
>in every CO" arrangement.

I dont think the issue is about having the cash to get started with
DSLAMs, but rather if the telcos are blocking the way for those who can.

Dont forget - Every large ISP started with one customer.

We have almost 300 local number areas in Sweden, and we serve the entire
nation. Im having nightmares about how we are going to become DSL
enabled, and how much money we have to put down to get it working. Today
we run a single megapop in Stockholm and haul all the telephone and
leased lines to that POP (Sweden is aprox 2000 Km long and 800 Km wide).

We hope to maintain only the one megapop, or a couple of strategic
superpops. Isent that a way to do it in the US? In that way you wont
have to buy DSLAMs all over the place.

Regards

Mikael Hugo

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1DFDD6A058ED111BA4100E0290BC51F046B27>