Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 03 Oct 1999 14:40:22 +0900
From:      "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
Cc:        "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: new sigset_t and upgrading: a proposal
Message-ID:  <37F6EC46.5C7E4EA4@newsguy.com>
References:  <19991003030956.C3DBB1CB0@overcee.netplex.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm wrote:
> 
> For things like config etc, that particular problem is almost over.  It
> does very VERY little now and I can't see that we'll have incompatable
> changes (apart from shooting it and using a lightweight kernel/module build
> organizer/manager/whatever).  All config(8) does at present is three things:
> 1: build the Makefile and options files
> 2: extract fragments of the static configuration and export it in MI format
>    for the bootstrap.
> 3: get in the way.

How about stable's config? If upgrading to 4.0-STABLE is going to be
kernel-first, we need a compatible config in RELENG_3 as soon as
possible, if they are not the same already.
--
Daniel C. Sobral			(8-DCS)
dcs@newsguy.com
dcs@freebsd.org

	Rule 69: Do unto other's code as you'd have it done unto yours


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37F6EC46.5C7E4EA4>