Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 4 Jan 2021 09:14:15 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org>, "Hartmann, O." <ohartmann@walstatt.org>,  FreeBSD CURRENT <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: CURRENT, usr/src on git, howto "mergemaster"?
Message-ID:  <CANCZdfpGeifVQJENJ7Tk1LkMwk_NUK_U37h65rHw%2B6jtzv5Uwg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3137a3ce-50c8-bee5-6a15-7701e3281500@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20210104123512.0f5e1b01@hermann.fritz.box> <X/MKNnDIdd/mCUNP@albert.catwhisker.org> <3137a3ce-50c8-bee5-6a15-7701e3281500@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 5:57 AM Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On 04/01/2021 12:29, David Wolfskill wrote:
>
> > Caveat: Since the switch, I have yet to encounter a case where I needed
> > to merge a change in (e.g., because of a newly-created user, or there
> > was a commit to /etc/crontab or /etc/newsyslog.conf).  I may find things
> > rather "more interesting" when that happens; we shall see.
>
> The process of merging changes in etcupdate(1) is essentially identical
> to merging in mergemaster(1) -- the difference being that typically
> etcupdate(1) will run to completion without any user intervention
> needed, or else it will flag up that there are unresolved differences to
> merge and flag to the user to run `etcupdate resolve` as a separate
> command.
>

etcupdate does a full three merge, while mergemaster fakes it in a number
of ways. etcupdate directly keeps track of the resolutions, which is why
$FreeBSD$ doesn't matter so much to it.

mergemaster is deprecated and will likely be removed from the system
because it has no maintainer and is quite a bit harder to keep working than
etcupdate.

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfpGeifVQJENJ7Tk1LkMwk_NUK_U37h65rHw%2B6jtzv5Uwg>