Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 09:35:59 -0400 From: Jesse Guardiani <jesse@wingnet.net> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM portable filesystem abstraction? Message-ID: <c8l0jv$m8v$1@sea.gmane.org> References: <c8iu9o$jd9$1@sea.gmane.org> <c8j3jg$12s$2@sea.gmane.org> <20040520201759.GB10119@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <200405211032.16952.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel O'Connor wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, 21 May 2004 05:47, Brooks Davis wrote: >> > I'm surprised that device manufacturers haven't sponsored this kind of >> > research yet. >> >> Since for most of them, all the word is a windows box except for a few >> annoying nuts running MacOS or Linux, FAT seems to be good enough for >> them. :-( > > There is a read only UFS1 driver for Windows XP > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=33782+0+archive/2004/freebsd-fs/20040509.freebsd-fs > > MacOSX and Linux can read/write UFS1 fine as well. -------------^^^^^^ Are you sure about that? Everything I've seen on the web indicates that Linux can barely read UFS1, much less write it. That would be an ideal solution short term if it's true though. -- Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator WingNET Internet Services, P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605 423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f) http://www.wingnet.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c8l0jv$m8v$1>