Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:19:41 -0500 From: Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org> To: rgrimes@freebsd.org Cc: "K. Macy" <kmacy@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Matt Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>, src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r344487 - in head/sys: conf gnu/gcov Message-ID: <20190226221941.zt4y7t2455c5dwlb@mutt-hbsd> In-Reply-To: <201902261627.x1QGRefq046574@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> References: <20190226154535.q32nwf6xyupexkta@mutt-hbsd> <201902261627.x1QGRefq046574@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--2e7hjzos5uhwlegf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 08:27:40AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 06:18:42PM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > > > The modest increase in activation energy for that task seems wort= h it > > > > > for the short-term gains of reduced integration cost (this code w= ill > > > > > greatly improve our ZFS-on-Linux test coverage.) > > > > > > > > > > Rod rightly points out that we haven't accepted SPDX tags alone as > > > > > license statements. The standard GPL v2.0 boiler plate should be= added > > > > > to this file along side the tag. > > > >=20 > > > > I've copied the full copyright attribution that is in the > > > > corresponding files on Linux. Is there some reason why FreeBSD > > > > requires the files to be inflated with the full license text where = the > > > > original lacks it? > > >=20 > > > I think for a few reasons, I doubt you copied the whole distribution > > > that this file came from, as I am sure that distribution included > > > a LICENSE file. Second if you actually read the GPL v2 documentation > > > and follow what it says it says you must do this, just because some > > > one else does not follow the rules of what the GPL v2 says does not > > > give us to knowingling not do it. Third this is a particular dangeri= ous > > > area for BSD to be mixing a GPL code with its kernel, to my knowlege > > > we have never had any gpl code in the kernel, no have we ever > > > allowed it, but thats a seperate argument, that should be made. > >=20 > > Would the arm64 DTS/DTB files count as "GPL code in the kernel?" > >=20 > > I, too, would like less GPL in project, both in userland in kernel. > > But, I can understand the desire for gcov. Note that I'm not > > advocating either way that FreeBSD perform an action. ;) >=20 > Didnt we just remove an inbase, compiling BSD licensed chunk of > code called DRM and move it to ports. So if that was possible > this should be very rapidly applied here and this issue goes away. DRM !=3D DTS/DTB --=20 Shawn Webb Cofounder and Security Engineer HardenedBSD Tor-ified Signal: +1 443-546-8752 Tor+XMPP+OTR: lattera@is.a.hacker.sx GPG Key ID: 0x6A84658F52456EEE GPG Key Fingerprint: 2ABA B6BD EF6A F486 BE89 3D9E 6A84 658F 5245 6EEE --2e7hjzos5uhwlegf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEKrq2ve9q9Ia+iT2eaoRlj1JFbu4FAlx1u3gACgkQaoRlj1JF bu4V+g//SyK0wMt07RJ74BbZUqYJ918yTyPrMyslrErWWUJSKU4EdLKLL64JyWSZ AplfxhJvi22oDguiGOg3aeEr+cpS2AugssfhATsxBD+6ub3Y6uFKm0btDz8M+20r +YrvhKInaRsZDA64T3kGoxSAnaxGOrMFGYNwMPcONzBwvqbrmWbWtkLggDe72TmM 1t7mUQzspwgxFJUWzXpq3AbKnQ01oE2teoY8ziRREO49RC1Vn9cx5fIB5z2lO760 VaLbwdh+agUnqmHxUbImA8KwuQjXT1BK3O5Yr6fnCfI+RwGOyEKAJf/99a3WQkXp F156sZ83ou8+jvgg6ibb0B+VC7i6y+E3Fkiu0nnJhu6iZloX1sC4ewx7YHNK52ft zc7sctKsAmH8aRqqTUOUeLGXln2iaBOcSOD3AhxMouDkIkoOG+bHTVQ40XoRF4OU Q97xmjpTygibMKdQQqnYJyGcxU8hXe7D0OXDmNRU0kJ3E4xte31V2e/5iE2PuMXm H/O/jVo1ryeUaD8YLc0OgrxKva2Yz+e2vMX5WnUAY+2ES7VYYeOkXE0lE6SGAEAU 3IMOKUNmbunzHHQyVbEGmJka8y5kRayGoYwWI96UPKVTrnHWb42Q8h0HU7s3buPo WtJ5+OoGYZ1AIVCY+GFQR17A840FETSfEI37Bp5lxC6ywo+fGcM= =InE5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2e7hjzos5uhwlegf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190226221941.zt4y7t2455c5dwlb>