Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 12:48:13 -0800 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: some woes about rc.conf.site Message-ID: <199902072048.MAA07248@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Feb 1999 17:05:42 %2B0100." <19990207170542.A90515@titan.klemm.gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > What do you think ? Or what are your experiences ? I hate it unreservedly. If we need a source of seeded default values, we should have rc.conf.default, uncommented, read-only. rc.conf is where people expect to make their changes, and it is immensely bogus to have sysinstall creating rc.conf.site which is quietly included *after* everything in rc.conf (so that when someone changes rc.conf, the change is overridden). -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902072048.MAA07248>