Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 04:56:45 +0800 (CST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: nate@root.org Cc: peter@wemm.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/include dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/amd64/include dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/compat/netbsd dvcfg.h physio_proc.h src/sys/dev/ct bshw_machdep.c ct.c ct_isa.c src/sys/d Message-ID: <20040317.045645.83723898.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20040316125222.G96418@root.org> References: <20040316.224458.21308983.non@ever.sanda.gr.jp> <20040316.215043.22018054.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040316125222.G96418@root.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message: <20040316125222.G96418@root.org>
Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> writes:
: On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > In message: <20040316.224458.21308983.non@ever.sanda.gr.jp>
: > non@ever.sanda.gr.jp writes:
: > : From: Takahashi Yoshihiro <nyan@jp.FreeBSD.org>
: > : Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 21:14:53 +0900 (JST)
: > : > In article <200403150741.38591.peter@wemm.org>
: > : > Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> writes:
: > : > > I don't really care where they go, as long as it isn't in the MD include
: > : > > areas (they are not MD!), and not in sys/. My favorites right now are
: > : > > dev/pc98/* or compat/pc98/*. I would also like sys/device_port.h to
: > : > > move there too since it is used by the same group of ct/ncv/nsp/stg
: > : > > drivers.
: > : >
: > : > I repeat that they have NO relations with pc98. So, the above
: > : > proposals are not acceptable.
: > :
: > : I agree with nyan-san. They are not specific to pc98 not for
: > : compatibility. I think they should be in sys/ or dev/dev/* or
: > : somewhere MI and not in compat/* .
: >
: > dev/pc98 isn't right. I have pcmcia cards that are supported by the
: > ncv, nsp and stg drivers running on an i386 box. dev/sys is fine by
: > me too if you are looking for a name.
:
: Blech, did you see the suggestion for /src/sys/dev/ic/ ?
Yes. I saw that since I made it.
I like dev/include, but maybe a more fundamental question is that
these are a portability layer shared between a number of differen
systems, does that layer have a name?
Warner
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040317.045645.83723898.imp>