Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 13:39:34 -0700 From: Lyndon Nerenberg VE7TCP <lyndon@orthanc.com> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, gnats@freefall.freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/1139: uname.1 and uname.c disagree about display ordering Message-ID: <199604142039.NAA10243@multivac.orthanc.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 14 Apr 1996 04:40:52 EDT." <Pine.BSI.3.92.960414043706.216B-100000@freebsd.ki.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc G Fournier <scrappy@ki.net> writes:
Marc> I may be missing the point here, but option ordering
Marc> doesn't seem to make any difference:
Read the source and you'll see why.
Marc> -a Behave as though the options -m, -n, -r, -s, and -v
Marc> were speci- fied.
Marc> It doesn't say in what order, just that it will behave
Marc> as if all were specified.
True, but the implication (as I read it) is that things will come out
in the documented order.
Your comments point out another bug - the output should match the option
ordering specified on the command line.
--lyndon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604142039.NAA10243>