Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:17:01 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: freebsd-current Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> Subject: Re: nagios vs w/uptime Message-ID: <4A76A371-B573-4E62-BE78-94944963FFD0@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <A3904FE0-2D03-4290-B29E-395E8C6F6F96@xcllnt.net> References: <54DA617A.4090309@wemm.org> <A3904FE0-2D03-4290-B29E-395E8C6F6F96@xcllnt.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> On 10 Feb 2015, at 21:13, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> wrote: > > [Moving to current@] > >> On Feb 10, 2015, at 11:52 AM, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> wrote: >> >> Surprises: >> * nagios doesn't like w / uptime anymore. libxo perhaps? > > Seems most likely, although I haven’t seen any differences in output > in my (admittedly limited) testing. > > In what way does Nagios not like w/uptime? > Any concrete errors, output or misbehavior? > Ideally: can you reproduce the problem? > Just compared 10.1 to current, unmodified output looks the same, but pipelines don't work properly: 10.1: # uptime | wc 1 12 68 Current: # uptime | wc 0 0 0 # uptime | cat # uptime 10:16PM up 9 mins... > -- > Marcel Moolenaar > marcel@xcllnt.net >help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A76A371-B573-4E62-BE78-94944963FFD0>