Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Sep 2022 17:57:47 -0400
From:      Shawn Webb <shawn.webb@hardenedbsd.org>
To:        Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>
Cc:        Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, Mike Karels <mike@karels.net>, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: git: 24e1824e4646 - main - Deprecate telnet daemon
Message-ID:  <20220921215747.bpb2irggvq5bibog@mutt-hbsd>
In-Reply-To: <20220921215536.886F9212@slippy.cwsent.com>
References:  <202209211517.28LFHkoJ089471@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20220921163951.17C77AC@slippy.cwsent.com> <8EC34FC3-F299-4B03-AD4E-83D062D0E9F6@karels.net> <Yyt%2BEOM/Bnth88Xv@FreeBSD.org> <20220921214546.426y6o4jpnsfsa2l@mutt-hbsd> <20220921215536.886F9212@slippy.cwsent.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 02:55:36PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
> In message <20220921214546.426y6o4jpnsfsa2l@mutt-hbsd>, Shawn Webb writes:
> > 
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 02:11:44PM -0700, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > >   Mike,
> > >=20
> > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 01:02:17PM -0500, Mike Karels wrote:
> > > M> I have no problem with deprecating (or removing) telnetd in base.  I
> > > M> think the client should remain, though.  I use it frequently, although
> > > M> not on the telnet port.  ftp* are another issue; anonymous FTP is a
> > > M> perfectly reasonable usage.  I use it to download FreeBSD images often.
> > >=20
> > > Is there any service where telnet to a port would be preferred over nc(1)?
> >
> > I wonder if it would be worthwhile to hardlink telnet(1) to nc(1).
> 
> No. Though nc -t is supposed to be compatible with telnet, it is not. No 
> sense fooling people into thinking nc, even with the -t argument, is the 
> same as telnet. It is not and it will be the source of many PRs which will 
> eventually waste developer's time making nc behave just like telnet does. 
> It is better to simply move it to ports for those who absolutely need it.

Good points. Thanks for the info!

-- 
Shawn Webb
Cofounder / Security Engineer
HardenedBSD

https://git.hardenedbsd.org/hardenedbsd/pubkeys/-/raw/master/Shawn_Webb/03A4CBEBB82EA5A67D9F3853FF2E67A277F8E1FA.pub.asc

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=WZT3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20220921215747.bpb2irggvq5bibog>