Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 03:32:44 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 240774] security/py-fido2: Update to 0.7.1 Message-ID: <bug-240774-21822-QKbn4ysGZX@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-240774-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-240774-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240774 --- Comment #11 from Michael Gmelin <grembo@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #10) Thanks for the detailed explanation. If it makes you feel better, I've never seen an organization that didn't struggle with getting this right. I've seen many approaches, including chan= ging those fields to something that doesn't indicate any importance whatsoever (= once I've seen them abused to show if the task was on time or not, which certain= ly doesn't make much sense in our context). Telling urgency and importance apart is generally hard (urgent to some, important to many? Important only if solved until X?). For importance I once considered providing two separate measures, simply to understand how the contributor/requester feels about the issue: a) how important do you think this is to others? b) how important is it to you, personally? This would allow the requester to express an "educated guess" based rational assessment as well as a personal/emotional component. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-240774-21822-QKbn4ysGZX>