Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:15:27 -0500 (EST) From: David Miller <dmiller@miningworks.com> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: small@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "nanobsd" prototype Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403121213300.93913-100000@search.sparks.net> In-Reply-To: <20040312170931.GC7661@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 11:27:22PM -0800, Wes Peters wrote: > > Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > >On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > > > >>Feedback of all sorts most welcome! And more documentation > > >>to arrive as it gets written. > > > > > > > > >wouldn't it make sense to put nanoBSD in release alongside picoBSD? > > >(that still leaves us microBSD and milliBSD :-) > > > > And femtobsd for the single floppy disk image. > > Followed by attobsd for those who think init(1) is bloatware. Lets not forget minibsd. Very functional for those who'd rather spend another ten bucks for a bigger flash card and have a larger subset of useful tools than spend many hours trying to save a few K here and there. --- David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0403121213300.93913-100000>