Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 13:56:56 +1030 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: Stuart Henderson <sh@eclipse.net.uk> Cc: aunty <aunty@comcen.com.au>, up@3.am, Sue Blake <sue@welearn.com.au>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: partition sizes Message-ID: <19991218135656.G1108@freebie.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <385A5D05.64C9A5CF@eclipse.net.uk> References: <19991216140442.B88143@welearn.com.au> <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912152253060.95202-100000@richard2.pil.net> <19991217082605.G46720@freebie.lemis.com> <19991217124743.A141@comcen.com.au> <385A5D05.64C9A5CF@eclipse.net.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, 17 December 1999 at 15:55:49 +0000, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> is minimise and repair the damage. Often after a reboot a server is >> offline while fscking, and I'd like those periods to be shorter, ie, >> not 8 gigs worth every time, and to have less to restore if a >> filesystem is really hosed. > > In case you don't know (it's in man fsck), if you want to cut > down the fsck time to minimum, multiple disks are better since they > can be checked in parallel. Multiple disks are always better, because they can be accessed in parallel :-) Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991218135656.G1108>