Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:54:49 -0800 From: Jason Helfman <bsd-src@helfman.org> To: Lampros Chaidas <lamproschaidas@aol.com> Cc: "freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Possible typo on doc/handbook/ports-using.html ? Message-ID: <9F71B2D3-E4A6-439B-BFFC-242303A0DE12@helfman.org> In-Reply-To: <8D0F4110F6167E7-2378-15694@webmail-d224.sysops.aol.com> References: <8D0F4110F6167E7-2378-15694@webmail-d224.sysops.aol.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> On Feb 9, 2014, at 4:49 PM, Lampros Chaidas <lamproschaidas@aol.com> wrote: > > Hi there, > > I was just reading through the documentation for getting the ports collection with the subversion method and noticed the following in "Procedure 5.2. Subversion Method" - the link is http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-using.html > > "If the ports tree is not available, Subversion can be installed as a package: > # pkg install subversion > If pkgng is being used to manage packages, Subversion can be installed with it instead: > # pkg install subversion" > > It looks like it's the same command in both situations - this looks redundant to me, is there a difference here that maybe I'm missing? > > Thanks, > - Lampros Both statements are true, however I believe this can be reworded and condensed. I'll put together a patch. - jghhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9F71B2D3-E4A6-439B-BFFC-242303A0DE12>