Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 26 Mar 2002 10:40:44 -0500
From:      Tom Rhodes <darklogik@pittgoth.com>
To:        "Gary W. Swearingen" <swear@blarg.net>
Cc:        freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: docs/35378: Handbook has inaccurate description of  freebsd-security list
Message-ID:  <3CA0967C.6020802@pittgoth.com>
References:  <200203251830.g2PIU4h68775@freefall.freebsd.org> <bjvgbjkb9o.gbj@localhost.localdomain>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Gary W. Swearingen wrote:

> Tom Rhodes <darklogik@pittgoth.com> writes:
> 
> 
>> I reread this pr, and feel strongly that it can be closed.
>> 
>> Opions?
>>
> 
> Assuming that you don't want to do more research on it, you might give
> the PR author a chance to survey opinion on -security and report back.
> I didn't notice -security in the CC list and it seems like something
> that they should have some say about.


Well, i'm still subscribed, and due to the low volume of email, I will 
not be unsubscribing anytime soon.  Its nice to get more knowledgeable 
opinions on key sizes and other things ;)


> 
> 
> My 2 cents: The -security charter has a few more words than the
> description's "security issues", but is nearly as nebulous.  It seems
> fitting that the list should get a wide variety of threads.  I don't
> know how charter changes get made around here, but it seems to me that
> list charters shouldn't get changed without some kind of survey of
> readers.  If they want less variety of messages, then they should
> "authorize" a change of the charter AND the description.
> 
> I'll also note that the list is in the "general" list of lists, not the
> "technical list" of lists.  The PR's changes, if made, should probably
> also be accompanied by a move of the list to "technical" list of lists.
> 
> Rant: The term "technical discussion", which gets bandied about many of the
> charters, seems to apply to any list except maybe -chat (and there only
> in the charter, not the list!), and leaves me wondering what is really
> meant.
> 
> 
> 

well, as I have stated, the current security list seems to be consumed
with, what I think, relative questions about security.  They have had
threads concerning ssh, and ipfw(8), but nothing like ``hi, help me 
setup ipfw for my system'' blah blah.

-- 
Tom (Darklogik) Rhodes
www.Pittgoth.com Gothic Liberation Front
www.FreeBSD.org  The Power To Serve


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3CA0967C.6020802>