Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 11:35:21 -0700 From: YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> To: enoch <ixew@hotmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [nfe] DHCP failure on 8-stable Message-ID: <20120403183521.GA7380@michelle.cdnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <87ty11670b.fsf@hotmail.com> References: <jl3lp1$lla$1@dough.gmane.org> <20120330233819.GC7325@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <4F75C5EC.6090303@hotmail.com> <20120402195215.GA3571@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <jlblna$ptp$1@dough.gmane.org> <20120403023225.GD3571@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <87ty11670b.fsf@hotmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 07:36:36PM -0400, enoch wrote: > YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 03:50:02AM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> On 04/02/2012 03:52 PM, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:40:44AM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> >> On 03/30/2012 19:38, YongHyeon PYUN wrote: > >> >>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:01:52AM -0400, enoch wrote: > >> >>>> Recently it became extremely difficult to pass the DHCP discovery step > >> >>>> on boot. Now I am using the buggy [nve] instead. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Can anyone help? > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> >>> Did you set synchronous_dhclient option in rc.conf? > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> Yes: ifconfig_nfe0="SYNCDHCP" > >> >> > >> >> I guess [nfe] is undergoing gradual devel changes of some sort as before > >> >> it had some chance of reporting "empty headers" on initial ifconfig and > >> >> refusing to work. Sorry, I should have reported when encountering the > >> >> first problems rather than solve by reboot. > >> > > >> > Would you show me the output of both dmesg(nfe(4) and its PHY only) > >> > and 'sysctl dev.nfe.0.stats'? > >> > It would be also helpful to know whether nfe(4) still sees > >> > incoming traffic. > >> > Does assigning static IP work? > >> > > >> > >> Static IP direct communication attempt from this desktop to another > >> laptop through a crossover cable fails as follows. Thanks. > >> > >> nfe0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 > >> options=82008<VLAN_MTU,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE> > >> ether 00:1f:bc:00:19:dc > >> inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > >> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT > >> <full-duplex,flowcontrol,master,rxpause,txpause>) > >> status: active > >> > >> nfe0: link state changed to UP > >> nfe0: <NVIDIA nForce 430 MCP13 Networking Adapter> port 0xf200-0xf207 > >> mem 0xefffb000-0xefffbfff irq 21 at device 20.0 on pci0 > >> miibus1: <MII bus> on nfe0 > > > > It seems you've omitted PHY driver here. What PHY driver was > > attached to nfe(4)? > > > > miibus1: <MII bus> on nfe0 > rgephy1: <RTL8169S/8110S/8211B media interface> PHY 1 on miibus1 > > >> nfe0: Ethernet address: 00:1f:bc:00:19:dc > >> nfe0: [FILTER] > >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) > >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) > >> nfe0: link state changed to UP > >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) > >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) > >> nfe0: discard frame w/o leading ethernet header (len 0 pkt len 0) > >> > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.frame_errors: 0 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.extra_bytes: 0 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.late_cols: 0 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.runts: 0 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.jumbos: 0 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.fifo_overuns: 0 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.crc_errors: 0 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.fae: 0 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.len_errors: 0 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.unicast: 56 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.multicast: 0 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.rx.broadcast: 280 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.octets: 7517 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.zero_rexmits: 51 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.one_rexmits: 0 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.multi_rexmits: 0 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.late_cols: 0 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.fifo_underuns: 0 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.carrier_losts: 0 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.excess_deferrals: 0 > >> dev.nfe.0.stats.tx.retry_errors: 0 > >> > > > > Thanks. Would you show me the output of "pciconf -lcbv"? > > > > nfe0@pci0:0:20:0: class=0x068000 card=0x10003842 chip=0x026910de rev=0xa3 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'NVIDIA Corporation' > device = 'MCP51 Network Bus Enumerator' > class = bridge > bar [10] = type Memory, range 32, base 0xefffb000, size 4096, enabled > bar [14] = type I/O Port, range 32, base 0xf200, size 8, enabled > cap 01[44] = powerspec 2 supports D0 D1 D2 D3 current D0 > > Interestingly, now that nfe0 is using a static IP it sometimes boots > up properly. Are you interested in its good working? Yes I am. Would you try attached patch and let me know whether the patch makes any difference on your box? --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="nfe.power.diff" Index: sys/dev/nfe/if_nfe.c =================================================================== --- sys/dev/nfe/if_nfe.c (revision 233767) +++ sys/dev/nfe/if_nfe.c (working copy) @@ -836,12 +836,6 @@ if ((sc->nfe_flags & NFE_PWR_MGMT) == 0) return; - NFE_WRITE(sc, NFE_RXTX_CTL, NFE_RXTX_RESET | NFE_RXTX_BIT2); - NFE_WRITE(sc, NFE_MAC_RESET, NFE_MAC_RESET_MAGIC); - DELAY(100); - NFE_WRITE(sc, NFE_MAC_RESET, 0); - DELAY(100); - NFE_WRITE(sc, NFE_RXTX_CTL, NFE_RXTX_BIT2); pwr = NFE_READ(sc, NFE_PWR2_CTL); pwr &= ~NFE_PWR2_WAKEUP_MASK; if (sc->nfe_revid >= 0xa3 && @@ -849,6 +843,12 @@ sc->nfe_devid == PCI_PRODUCT_NVIDIA_NFORCE430_LAN2)) pwr |= NFE_PWR2_REVA3; NFE_WRITE(sc, NFE_PWR2_CTL, pwr); + NFE_WRITE(sc, NFE_RXTX_CTL, NFE_RXTX_RESET | NFE_RXTX_BIT2); + NFE_WRITE(sc, NFE_MAC_RESET, NFE_MAC_RESET_MAGIC); + DELAY(100); + NFE_WRITE(sc, NFE_MAC_RESET, 0); + DELAY(100); + NFE_WRITE(sc, NFE_RXTX_CTL, NFE_RXTX_BIT2); } --wac7ysb48OaltWcw--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120403183521.GA7380>