Date: Mon, 08 May 2000 01:49:54 +0900 From: Shigeyuki Fukushima (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCSiFFZ0xQRzcbKEI=?=) <shige@FreeBSD.org> To: reg@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, asami@cs.berkeley.edu Subject: Re: Proposal for USE_* directives in Mk/bsd.port.mk Message-ID: <20000507165002718.RWFG.890.t-mta4.odn.ne.jp@mta4.odn.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20000430120305.C309@shale.csir.co.za> References: <20000430105058.B309@shale.csir.co.za> <20000430181355835.KOJS.890.t-mta4.odn.ne.jp@mta4.odn.ne.jp> <20000430120305.C309@shale.csir.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Jeremy Lea <reg@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Proposal for USE_* directives in Mk/bsd.port.mk Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 12:03:05 -0700 Hi. > USE_* are not user options, and should *never* be set from the command > line. WITH_* and WITHOUT_* are user options. If you want the port to > do this (I don't think it is useful - are you going to support two MD5's?): Is this an official policy? Would you like to show me difference between USE_* and WITH_*(WITHOUT_*) and HAVE_*. Is this policy already documented? Thanks. --- shige (Shigeyuki Fukushima) <shige@FreeBSD.ORG> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000507165002718.RWFG.890.t-mta4.odn.ne.jp>