Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:36:52 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: prime <guomingyan@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Tiffany Snyder <tiffany.snyder@gmail.com> Subject: Re: How priority propagation works on read/write lock? Message-ID: <20060115113523.O38874@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <1fa17f810601141109u3e3a0586ud3b3cc86ebc6e80@mail.gmail.com> References: <1fa17f810601122232l25551bc5n4e4a01ff6b7921e@mail.gmail.com> <ac7deb50601130146y4abd573dn2ac47622374c1551@mail.gmail.com> <1fa17f810601130220h521590banff7d775a8bd4eaa6@mail.gmail.com> <b63e753b0601141040v1430da8ag28878e2a31aef486@mail.gmail.com> <1fa17f810601141109u3e3a0586ud3b3cc86ebc6e80@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, prime wrote: > On 1/15/06, Tiffany Snyder <tiffany.snyder@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Does FreeBSD support rwlocks? ... > FreeBSD supports sx now,see sx(9).sx has the same semanteme > as rwlock. While semantically they are very simila, John Baldwin has a work-in-progress implementation of rwlock's in Perforce. Given the progress he appears to be making, I imagine we'll see it in CVS within a week or two. Robert N M Watson
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060115113523.O38874>