Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2021 19:37:48 -0400 From: Nathaniel Nigro <nathaniel.nigro@gmail.com> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Can ipfw Rules Be Based On DNS Name Message-ID: <CAD=pOf=85A5kFp1PEN72QdJs5G7tpr_daFMuHqy65bX%2B78oHsg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <ac332bfe-314a-ac76-eeb4-f0111bac4d0d@tundraware.com> References: <ac332bfe-314a-ac76-eeb4-f0111bac4d0d@tundraware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ipfw -q add 111 deny udp from (domain) to any(or local ip) (port) in via (interface) keep-state Doesn=E2=80=99t work? On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 4:05 PM Tim Daneliuk via freebsd-questions < freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote: > I have used ipfw for years to configure access at the IP address level. > > I now need to block a particular domain and all its subdomains from > accessing anything on the server. Is this possible using the top level > domain name rather than IPs (which appear to be fluid). > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 -=3DND=3D-
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAD=pOf=85A5kFp1PEN72QdJs5G7tpr_daFMuHqy65bX%2B78oHsg>