Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 07:54:14 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, John Birrell <jb@FreeBSD.org>, John Birrell <jb@what-creek.com>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile Message-ID: <20080528145414.GD85398@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20080526082614.C6489@fledge.watson.org> References: <200805250248.m4P2mv8U026913@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080525180014.S63463@fledge.watson.org> <20080525195955.GB5179@what-creek.com> <20080525225523.F36357@fledge.watson.org> <20080525221112.GH5179@what-creek.com> <20080526082614.C6489@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 08:31:02AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > According to our tier documentation, sun4v is a tier 2 platform -- either > on the way up, or on the way down, depending on how you look at it. All of > the other tier 2 platforms, including ARM, PowerPC, ia64 and sparc64, > appear in make universe, and I would expect objections if any of them > were removed from make universe also. I think you're missing the distinction between architectures that are runable (sparc64, ia64, PowerPC, ARM) and those that are not - sun4v. The reason why folks would object to those being removed is because they actually do work. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080528145414.GD85398>