Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:53:30 -0500 From: Lawrence Sica <lomion@mac.com> To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Cc: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> Subject: Re: Good BSD/Linux Article (somewhat off-topic) Message-ID: <0A4E7A9C-4866-11D8-A069-000393A335A2@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.1.20040116204850.03f69680@imap.sfu.ca> References: <20040116160124.GF41788@over-yonder.net> <20040116081448.I78161-100000@moo.sysabend.org> <6.0.1.1.1.20040116175159.03f4dd48@imap.sfu.ca> <C4AAC7AE-4861-11D8-A069-000393A335A2@mac.com> <6.0.1.1.1.20040116204850.03f69680@imap.sfu.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 16, 2004, at 3:51 PM, Colin Percival wrote: > At 20:22 16/01/2004, Lawrence Sica wrote: >> On Jan 16, 2004, at 12:56 PM, Colin Percival wrote: >> > I think the /. effect is overrated these days. Network connections >> and >>> processors have gotten faster much more rapidly than the slashdot >>> readership has grown; the only time slashdot kills anything now is >>> when >>> people use excessively dynamic pages. >> >> I have to disagree here. As I have been slashdotted in the recent >> past. It >> still has a serious affect. > > Well, it didn't have very significant effect on December 30th, when > my > depenguinator was slashdotted. :) > Well i was working for a "christian" hosting company. And we were slashdotted very heavily heh, we also drew some attacks as a result at the same time. it is real fun dealing with a syn flood then a slashdot then another attack ;) --Larry
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0A4E7A9C-4866-11D8-A069-000393A335A2>