Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:38:42 +0200 From: Nikos Ntarmos <ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gprof's broken in 7-CURRENT Message-ID: <20071129233842.GA57951@ace.netcins.ceid.upatras.gr> In-Reply-To: <200711292024.lATKOq5R000769@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200711292024.lATKOq5R000769@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:24:52PM +0000, Luoqi Chen wrote: > > And to think that I mentioned this problem 5-6 months ago with gcc 4.2.x > > and now it finally gets publicity... > > Did I just hear someone volunteered to be a guinea pig? > > Garrett, would you like to try out my fix? It's actually quite simple, > [...] > > This file is in the kernel tree, but the change only affects libc build. > If you don't want to redo a world build, you may copy the patched profile.h > to /usr/include/machine and "make all install" inside /usr/src/lib/libc. > Then re-link -pg compiled code and try it out. Hi again. I couldn't wait for Garrett :) so I went on and tested your patch and gprof seems to work fine for me (at least for the executables I was interested in profiling anyway). This is i386 on a 7.0-BETA3 kernel and 7.0-BETA1 world. What are the chances for this to be committed in time for 7.0R? Thanks. \n\n -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Nikos Ntarmos <ntarmos@ceid.upatras.gr> iD8DBQFHT02Cm6J1ac+VFgoRAnaVAJ9n/WZY2nJU4Ym5qUFOBvg38p0lXQCfYDwT moIVew3+UhMLXLuJGEZd6HM= =J8RG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071129233842.GA57951>