Date: Mon, 27 Oct 1997 23:35:19 +0100 (MET) From: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> To: ache@nagual.pp.ru (=?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?=) Cc: guido@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-usrbin@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/su su.1 su.c Message-ID: <199710272235.XAA23016@gvr.gvr.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971028011353.2307A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net> from "[______ ______]" at "Oct 28, 97 01:19:11 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[______ ______] wrote: > On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Guido van Rooij wrote: > > > guido 1997/10/27 14:05:14 PST > > > > Modified files: > > usr.bin/su su.1 su.c > > Log: > > Add -c option that allows root to specify a login_class. > > Why not -L as for "pw"? I think we need somehow standartize login class > option between applications. F.e. "limits" uses -C (already occuped > in "pw") :-( > In fact I started with -C, and reverted to -c because that is what BSD/OS uses for the same option. I know -c is used in some other Unixen to specify a command. If more ppl feel this is more painfull than being incompatible with BSD/OS's su, please yeel and I'll chaneg it to -C (or -L or whatever). -Guido
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710272235.XAA23016>