Date: Tue, 2 Jul 1996 09:20:08 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Subject: Re: socketpair bug? Message-ID: <199607020720.JAA10893@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <96Jun30.222423pdt.177476@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> from Bill Fenner at "Jun 30, 96 10:24:20 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Bill Fenner wrote: > >See also my Usenet reply: socketpair() basically needs a similar libc > >syscall wrapper like pipe(). Right now, it uses the generic syscall > >wrapper which is wrong. (The XXX??'s can be removed again then. :) > > I think the answer is the other way around -- socketpair() works as it > is and just needs the two XXX'd lines removed, no need for it to have a > wrapper like pipe(). It's documented to work similar to pipe(2) however. Also, it looks orthogonal to make both the same. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607020720.JAA10893>