Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:09:17 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> Cc: Wen Heping <wen@freebsd.org>, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, wen heping <wenheping@gmail.com>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/eog-plugins Makefile ports/graphics/shotwell Makefile ports/graphics/ethumb Makefile ports/multimedia/dvdstyler Makefile ports/multimedia/mlt Makefile ports/net/mediatomb Makefile ports/net/minidlna Makefile ports/sysut Message-ID: <20110304100917.GA56262@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <69590488@h30.sp.ipt.ru> References: <AANLkTimDsgsj7syPJw18C67TkqZZ8=QqoTyGpma=Shjq@mail.gmail.com> <69590488@h30.sp.ipt.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 11:55:19AM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 16:37:25 +0800 wen heping wrote: > > 2011/3/4 Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru>: > > > On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 02:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Wen Heping wrote: > > > > > >> Modified files: > > >> graphics/eog-plugins Makefile > > >> graphics/shotwell Makefile > > >> graphics/ethumb Makefile > > >> multimedia/dvdstyler Makefile > > >> multimedia/mlt Makefile > > >> net/mediatomb Makefile > > >> net/minidlna Makefile > > >> sysutils/tracker-client Makefile > > >> www/swiggle Makefile > > >> x11-fm/gnome-commander2 Makefile > > >> x11-fm/nautilus Makefile > > >> x11-fm/thunar Makefile > > >> x11-toolkits/nucleo Makefile > > >> Log: > > >> - Bump PORTREVISION to chase the update of libexif > > > > > > Was it necessary to bump those and other PORTREVISIONS? So > > > far I was sure that PORTREVISION bumps are necessary as soon > > > In porter's handbook: > > Examples of when PORTREVISION should be bumped: > > .... > > Changes in the packing list or the install-time behavior of the > > package (e.g. change to a script which generates initial data for the > > package, like ssh host keys). > > ..... > > This update changed plist. I don't think so. Update of *graphics/libexif* changed *that port's* plist (added bunch of new translations), but shlib version was not bumped (it's a minor update), so PORTREVISIONs of the *dependent* ports should had been left intact. Your mentor should have told you this. :-) Now you've essentially urged lots of people around the world to rebuild their perfectly fine packages (considering that libexif is fairly common dependency). ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110304100917.GA56262>