Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:58:54 +0300 (MSK) From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, kmacy@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet tcp_syncache.c Message-ID: <20080124145713.K15031@mp2.macomnet.net> In-Reply-To: <47986F27.10401@freebsd.org> References: <200711200656.lAK6u4bc021279@repoman.freebsd.org> <4797B77E.2090605@freebsd.org> <20080124005006.D93697@odysseus.silby.com> <47986F27.10401@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[...] > > I'm not generally opposed to security improvements that only affect edge > > cases... but being unable to connect is not an edge case! > > Fully agreed. I'll reopen the PR and follow up with the originator > to do some further analysis. All operating system he cites that were > unable to connect correctly send timestamps and do not stop after > the SYN phase. So there must be something else at play here. Have > you received or heart of any *other* reports that may be related to > the timestamp check? > I saw this with my adsl router. Happy to test patches. -- Maxim Konovalov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080124145713.K15031>