Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2000 15:13:32 +0400 From: "Nick A. Leuta" <skynick@stu.lipetsk.su> To: "FreeBSD-Security" <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: PAM help needed Message-ID: <00bb01c032ab$3ee9ccc0$131fa8c0@skynick> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010101528120.39921-100000@iclub.nsu.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi! Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> wrote: > On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Richard Jones wrote: > > After walking through the FreeBSD sources I saw that: > > 1. none of the first group applications (except: login) has the support > > for PAM authentication (ifdefed). > > login is built with PAM by default. ftpd also has PAM support The same needed in sshd, su, lock etc... > > My questions are: > > a. Is any of my assumptions/conclusions wrong? > > b. Is there any work done on the subject to fix it? > > c. How stable is PAM on FreeBSD? > > d. Any known problems that you know from your experience? > I do not know of any problems with PAM under FreeBSD. > Seems that FreeBSD PAM library is taken without any > significant modifications from Linux PAM 0.65 distribution. Yes, it's true. But unlike FreeBSD, under Linux RH 6.x distribution all applications like login, passwd, su, vlock, xdm, xlock, xscreensaver (in /etc/pam.d also mentioned shutdown, xsaver...) using pam. ...Do FreeBSD's pam_* modules realize all known (auth, account, session, password) "module-types"? --- SkyNick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00bb01c032ab$3ee9ccc0$131fa8c0>