Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:08:37 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@FreeBSD.org>, Lapo Luchini <lapo@lapo.it> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security Makefile ports/security/hamachi Makefile distinfo pkg-descr ports/security/hamachi/files hamachi.sh.in patch-Makefile patch-tuncfg_tuncfg.c Message-ID: <20070907150837.3oeb85s6m88gwgkk@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <200709070747.l877l741067697@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200709070747.l877l741067697@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoting Edwin Groothuis <edwin@FreeBSD.org> (from Fri, 7 Sep 2007 =20
07:47:07 +0000 (UTC)):
> edwin 2007-09-07 07:47:07 UTC
>
> FreeBSD ports repository
>
> Modified files:
> security Makefile
> Added files:
> security/hamachi Makefile distinfo pkg-descr
> security/hamachi/files hamachi.sh.in patch-Makefile
> patch-tuncfg_tuncfg.c
> Log:
> new port: security/hamachi (supersedes ports/110850)
>
> New port of Hamachi VPN, using Linux official binary and a
> patch on tuncfg.c based on the official OSX release.
> Submitted by: Lapo Luchini <lapo@lapo.it>
> 1.1 +39 -0 ports/security/hamachi/Makefile (new)
From a USE_LINUX point of view it's good, but shouldn't the =20
post-patch be splited up into mostly post-extract and a do-build (with =20
removing NO_BUILD, off course)?
---snip---
post-patch:
=09${RM} -f ${WRKSRC}/tuncfg/tuncfg
=09${CC} ${CFLAGS} -o ${WRKSRC}/tuncfg/tuncfg ${WRKSRC}/tuncfg/tuncfg.c
=09upx -d ${WRKSRC}/hamachi
---snip---
Bye,
Alexander.
--=20
When we try to pick out anything by itself we find
it hitched to everything else in the universe.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070907150837.3oeb85s6m88gwgkk>